|
Petersen plea agreement does community a disservice
Letter to the Editor
A travesty of justice has occurred in the plea agreement proposed in the Wade Petersen case.
Even though the prosecution has a strong case against Petersen, prosecutors felt the need to strike a plea agreement that offers very little for holding Petersen accountable for his actions. One might argue that a plea was in the best interest of everyone involved; the only "best interest" served by this plea is Petersen's.
Petersen has put everyone through a tough year, denying any responsibility for his actions. Now he is willing to plead guilty to the charges in exchange for a very lenient sentence — and the right to have a gun. A girl is dead and he is worried about going hunting!
I am not heartless or unsympathetic in viewing this matter. It is sad that a 20-year-old made such a horrible choice. What is sadder is that Petersen still has not shown any responsibility or remorse for the results of those actions.
Petersen's actions were not a slight error in judgment. A young girl lost her life. Two other young girls' lives have been changed forever; they have endured physical and emotional pain and damage.
The bottom line is that Petersen broke the law that night, not once — but several times. Petersen hit three innocent girls, left them lying in the street for someone else to find — or hit again, and lied about doing it! Yet prosecutors still felt it necessary to cut a "sweetheart deal." Neither the families nor the community have been served well by that plea agreement. While a stiffer sentence will not bring Mariah back nor heal the others, the message this plea agreement is sending is break the law, repeatedly, and get a slap on the wrist.
The victims in this case will serve the real sentence. Under the proposed plea, Petersen will be out hunting in a very short time while the Okrusch, Kilmer and McCarthy families will be spending the next several years picking up the pieces of their lives.
If I were cynical, I would almost think that prosecutors Eileen Joyce and Samm Cox are more interested in running for county attorney than trying a difficult case. If this is the best they can do, then neither deserves our vote in November.
I hope the judge rejects or modifies the plea to make it meaningful.
MaryAnn Alexander 2900 Hannibal St.
Butte
| Civil Dialogue: | show/hide -13 comment(s)- |
|
The site mtstandard.com provides this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. If you don't see your comment, perhaps... more
|
|
|
TOP JOBS
|
The Montana Standard reserves the right to remove comments considered inappropriate for the community forum.